Published Jan 14, 2022, Updated Jan 20, 2022
The judge took the side of the insurance company, which refused to pay insurance to the children of a millionaire who died after being vaccinated.
World Today News – In France, the case of a wealthy elderly Parisian businessman who insured his life for many millions and died from COVID-vaccination caused a great resonance. The insurance company refused to pay money to the relatives of the deceased, and the court recognized the correctness of the company, reports Our Central Europe.
Doctors admitted that the man’s death was the result of vaccination. After that, the insurance company refused to pay the family money, because the insurance policy excludes the use of experimental drugs and treatments, including vaccination against coronavirus.
The family sued the insurance company, but lost. The judge ruled that the side effects of the experimental vaccine were made public and the deceased could not claim to be unaware of them when he voluntarily took the vaccine. The court also stressed that in France there is no law that forced him to be vaccinated.
“Therefore, his death, in fact, is a suicide,” the court ruled.
The insurance company noted that suicide, like death from an experimental drug, is not an insured event.
Earlier it was reported that in New Zealand 26-year-old man died shortly after vaccination from coronavirus drug company Pfizer. The authorities blamed the COVID drug for the death of a person.
Also in Croatia, a 33-year-old man died due to thrombosis after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine
Our Central Europe. – Our exclusive report (see below after the updates) is now making waves and has also been adopted by various other media. We also receive a large number of mails from readers who have already had or documented similar experiences:
*** UPDATED v. 01/20/2022 ***
The ADAC has adapted its website with the conditions for accident insurance and specifically emphasized that benefits after accidents after vaccination damage in the course of ordered mass vaccinations are specifically excluded
Accident insurance does not cover the following accidents:
> If you have an accident due to impaired consciousness as a result of drug use > If you have an accident
while driving a motor vehicle due to impaired consciousness as a result of alcohol consumption (with a blood alcohol content of 1.1 per mille or more).
> The damage to health is intentionally caused by you.
> Vaccination damage due to ordered mass vaccinations.
> Accidents while actively participating in motorsport competitions or training sessions.
> Accidents caused by war or civil war events
www.adac.de/produkte/versicherungen/unfallversicherung/ueberblick/
So if you drive your car to the vaccination and have an accident on the way home because you suddenly blacked out or fainted after the booster, look through your fingers – the ADAC says “THE BLAME ITSELF”
… and puts the vaccinations at war and civil war or an intentional intoxication with 1.1 per mille.
The ADAC advertises the vaccination
. First, it lures people to their deaths and then refuses insurance benefits.
Does it actually get any more despicable?
Vaccination – yes of course!
Numbers – of course not!
*** UPDATED v. 01/12/2022 ***
1. In this case, a private accident insurance company from the German liability insurance company tells a customer that valid vaccinations against known infectious diseases are covered, but NOT damage to health caused by the Covid vaccinations!
2. In this case, Techniker Krankenkasse also states that vaccination damage and other consequences of the Covid vaccination are NOT insured. Reference is made to the federal states that organize the vaccinations.
The case is currently causing a stir in France. A wealthy, elderly Parisian businessman from Versailles , who has taken out many life insurance policies (millions of dollars) for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, dies from a Covid vaccination (not disputed by the doctors and his life insurers). But then comes the hammer: the insurance company does not pay out the premium because the deceased acted at their own risk with the corona vaccination.
Ingestion of experimental syringe resulting in death is tantamount to suicide
In any case, the reasoning is a tough one: the insurance company refused to pay out to the family because the policy explicitly excludes the use of experimental drugs and treatments (including the corona vaccination). The family sued the insurance company, but lost. The judge states:
“The side effects of the experimental vaccine are being made public and the deceased could not claim ignorance when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France forcing him to be vaccinated. Therefore, his death is essentially suicide.” This means that the sale is doubly “fine out”, because suicide is also excluded from the policy.
Here is the summary verdict:
“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer, which legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, which has not been proven to be harmless, as a voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract, given the side effects announced, including death covered and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as valid and contractually justifiable, since this publicly known risk of death is legally considered suicide since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily risk death without being obliged or coerced to do so be.”
Vaccination deaths soon counted as suicides?
As a result, death after vaccination is now considered suicide by the courts (at least in France)! Insurers will now start not paying back life insurance policies on a large scale, as taking a lethal risk by getting vaccinated effectively locks them out of the contract, rendering it void. Unforeseen are the consequences for bank loans, etc. So far, nothing has been heard of this scandalous case in the French mainstream media.
The family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, publicized the case on social media.
US life insurance denies similar cases
Something similar has already been reported here from the USA: ” Life insurance companies can refuse payments for vaccinated people because Covid vaccines represent ‘medical experiments’.” However, life insurance companies there denied corresponding reports from injured parties:
“The fact is that life insurers, when deciding whether damage does not take into account whether or not a policyholder has received a COVID vaccine,” said Paul Graham, senior vice president of policy development for the American Life Insurers Council.
“Life insurance contracts state very clearly how policies work and what reasons, if any, can lead to a refusal to pay. A vaccine against COVID-19 is not one of them. The actuarial rating of an applicant’s insurability is not affected by the individual’s immunization status.”
However, these statements were only made after similar cases as in France were made public and labeled as “fake news” . Thus, the claims of the injured party stand against those of the insurance companies.
Editor’s note:
For the sake of order, it should be mentioned that, upon request, the domestic (D,Ö,CH) insurance companies promise not to make benefits dependent on the respective vaccination status, both for those who have been vaccinated and those who have not.
However, as everyone knows, there are calls from corona agitators to disadvantage the unvaccinated in terms of costs in the event of hospital stays.
The information from France here in the article refers to the sources we have mentioned and to information provided by Nicole Delépine, former head of the department of pediatric cancer medicine at the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, on the Riposte Laïque website .
