“A mass vaccination campaign could have altered peoples’ immunity to that disease. In other words, the process that kept it under control might have been changed by the intervention of the immune system that we made.”
Brett Weinstein Says Cardiac-Related Vaccine Injuries May Take Years to Surface
“If it knocks the last 15 years off your life, you wouldn’t be seeing that yet for most people”
Brett Weinstein Discusses the Agenda Behind Vaccine Mandates
“We had a violation of Nuremberg, and those who did not accept that violation have now been removed from their positions of power. Our system has just become much more amenable to violations of Nuremberg.”
Freddie Sayers sits down to discuss the pandemic response with biologist Bret Weinstein.
Before the pandemic, evolutionary biologist and former Evergreen professor Bret Weinstein was lauded by both sides of the political divide for his insights into the crisis on American campuses. As a member of the so-called ‘intellectual dark web’, Weinstein was expanding his audience and being profiled by legacy media like the New York Times.
Then the pandemic began and his heterodox perspective suddenly fell out of favour, even with many of his erstwhile allies.
Advocating for alternative treatments for Covid, questioning the efficacy of the global vaccine programme and challenging narratives of the pandemic came at a cost. Without warning, the Dark Horse podcast was demonetised on YouTube and Weinstein was forced to split from the views of his former friends and supporters.
So, how can we seek truth in such divided times? Freddie Sayers invited Bret into the UnHerd studio in London to try to understand what his views really are.