“When we went to medical school, we didn’t really appreciate that fact that there’s big money riding on one side of the fence or the other. It may not matter to us whether there are viruses or not, we just want to know the truth. But it does matter if you’re selling vaccines to viruses,” Dr. Lee Merritt said when interviewing Dr. Tom Cowan earlier this month.
Many leading health institutions around the world claim that viruses can be detected in the same way scientists detect exosomes in labs. Exosomes, which are between 30 to 150 nanometers in diameter, are the smallest type of extracellular vesicle known to man. These are small materials that travel in and out of cells to transport material.
“Exosomes can be found. Same size, same morphology and the same type of genetic material in exactly this way,” Dr. Cowan told Dr. Merritt.
He explained that just like exosomes, virus material is taken directly from a sick person and then put through a process of “maceration, filtering and ultra-centrifugation.” Scientists can even show the morphology of the material or characterise its genome. But no evidence has actually come out that this has been properly done with viruses.
“It’s simply not able to be done with any pathogenic virus,” he said.
He and his colleagues have conducted extensive investigations asking officials everywhere, including those from the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and even expert virologists in labs like the one in Yale University and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, whether or not they have seen virus particles in the fluids of sick people.
“And they say, ‘We don’t have [evidence],’” said Dr. Cowan.
He and his colleagues have also asked expert virologists whether SARS-CoV-2 has been successfully isolated and sequenced.
“We asked this guy … ‘Can you find SARS-CoV-2 in any fluid of any person you say has Covid?’ He said no. [We asked] why not. ‘Because there’s not enough virus to find,’” recalled Dr. Cowan.
He submitted Freedom of Information Act (“FoI”) requests to get the government to release scientific papers that describe the “isolation and purification and characterisation of any SARS-CoV-2 virus from any human being with so-called Covid-19” and none could be presented to him.
He believes this lack of data on SARS-CoV-2 should also call into question whether other viruses that supposedly caused well-known diseases like zika, ebola and even HIV are real.
Source: Virus that causes Covid-19 has NEVER been isolated in a lab – Drs Lee Merritt and Tom Cowan explain
Click on the image below to watch the interview on Brighteon.
Further reading: Exposing the lies of Germ Theory and virology using their own sources, ViroLIEgy
The Contagion Myth
In his book ‘The Contagion Myth’, Dr. Cowan spends a good length of time going through all the environmental, electrical and chemical causes of pandemics, convincingly showing that there is no need to invent stories of “killer viruses” when there are so many other obvious factors and causes, such as electrification, radiation, gases (methane, which could the real cause of malaria), chemical poisoning (e.g. DDT, which could be the real cause of polio), bedbugs (which could be the real cause of smallpox) and many more.
Essentially, what the authors are proposing is that so called “contagion” can actually be explained by communal or mass poisoning in an area – by everyone being subjected to the same toxicity/deficiency that gives rise to the disease. A certain cause occurs (people all in the same area are exposed to toxic EM fields, toxic gases or toxic chemicals, or are all subject to poor sanitation) and then a disease arises where everyone shares similar symptoms. There is no need for anyone to “pass” or “catch” anything – at least not on the physical level in terms of particles or viruses.
Source: Book Review, The Contagion Myth by Dr. Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell
Was Smallpox A Case of Medical Propaganda?
For generations, we have been conditioned to believe that smallpox is a highly contagious, indiscriminate, and deadly virus — that it killed many millions worldwide, and that we were only saved from its ghastly ravages by the development of vaccinations. However, what is commonly assumed as settled history may be the result of modern medical propaganda as there is another story: that vaccines did not eradicate smallpox, but actually made the problem worse.
Edward Jenner, often referred to as “the father of immunology,” began experimenting on cows after hearing a local farmer had apparently gained smallpox immunity by inoculating himself with cowpox secretions.
Jenner sat no examinations and purchased a £15 medical degree from St. Andrews University only after he had been practicing for twenty years. His opponents considered him vain, petulant, crafty, and greedy — a ‘self-deluded quack’ who omitted vital information and denounced his own findings only to reassert them when it suited him. Nevertheless, he managed to persuade the influential elites of his convictions and received a £30,000 grant from parliament (roughly £3 million in today’s money) to continue his work.
The Vaccination Act of 1853 made it compulsory for all babies under the age of three months to be vaccinated in England. Before this, the two-year death rate from the disease was 2,000, whereas eighteen years later, during the pandemic of 1871, it had reached 44,800. It is estimated that 90% of those who fell ill had been vaccinated.
Opposition to vaccination grew stronger, as the situation got worse, not better. Huge numbers of people across the land worried that the vaccine was unsafe and unproven. Parents were fined and thrown in prison for refusing to immunise their children, but their commitment to the cause didn’t waver. Through fierce, persistent, and active opposition, parliament eventually passed an act in 1898 that removed penalties and allowed parents to choose whether to have their children vaccinated.
The real problem with smallpox was filth and lack of hygiene surmised Sir Edwin Chadwick.
In her eponymous essay on smallpox, Dr. Vivian Virginia Vetrano writes:
“If hygienic care had been resorted to in the beginning of smallpox … no complications would have occurred and there would rarely be a genuine pustule.”
Back in those days patients were kept in bed, in warm rooms, with dirty blankets and closed windows. Doctors applied gauze that had been soaked in corrosive mercuric chloride or carbolic acid and tightly bound the dressings; white blood cells were destroyed; the pus couldn’t escape; toxicity increased and a second fever inevitably followed.
It would seem that medical intervention did not eradicate the disease but rather aggravated it.
Source: Smallpox: A Vaccine Myth?
